Assessing higher-order skills

Clarifying the expectations for essay-writing

Sue McGowan and David Rivett
University of South Australia

Discipline Area

Accounting

Key assessment issue addressed

Ensuring students focused on appropriate tasks required in essay writing assessment items that require higher order learning outcomes (i.e. analytical/problem solving skills) rather than simple description /summary of readings. This was that done by changing students' conceptions of what the task required.

The initiative

The key points of the initiative were twofold:

  1. To ensure students correctly conceptualized that the task required development of higher order learning skills by:
    • Providing detailed and explicit performance criteria, based on a conceptual (not topic specific) tasks and providing relative weightings for these. The 4 criteria were:
      Factual content - 30%
      Comprehension and argument - 45%
      Personal input, originality and insight - 15%
      Writing and presentation -10%

    • Providing standards for gradings to students .
      These standards explained the level of achievement required in each of the conceptual tasks to attain a specific grade (e.g.pass/ distinction). For example:
      For a grade of Pass 1 (55% - 64%)
      Overall, your paper satisfies the requirements and identifies and explains the key issues in the debate. It demonstrates an ability to analyse and present a logical argument; however there may be some flaws in logic or the argument may be incomplete. There is little demonstration of independence of thought.

  2. To motivate students to appreciate the importance of skills being developed in tasks by:
    • Linking and incorporating learning objectives to the specific assessment item by explaining how specific graduate (generic) qualities will be developed via this assignment: eg
      • Completing this assignment will help you towards becoming a graduate of the University of South Australia who:
        is an effective problem solver.

        How? The assignment requires you to evaluate and synthesize relevant information and to formulate conclusions about technical issues surrounding accounting for impairment of assets.
    • Incorporating requirements in assessment for students to reflect upon the development of these skills. Students were required to outline in a brief statement how the process of preparing the assignment had developed specific graduate qualities.

The reason for the initiative's effectiveness

The outcome was a significant improvement in student performance (both in quantitative aspects - such as pass rate/averages, and in qualitative - attitudes of students/quality of papers).

Reasons for effectiveness:

  1. Clarified requirements of assessment task, so students clearly understood the nature of the task and importance of specific activities (such as analysis)
  2. Students understood relevance/importance of skills being developed (via linkages to profession/graduate qualities and reflective statement).

Further details

Sue McGowan and David Rivett
School of Accounting and Information Systems
University of South Australia
sue.mcgowan@unisa.edu.au
david.rivett@unisa.edu.au


 
 

Back to Top